Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] BER ASN1 generated dissectors update?

From: "Kukosa, Tomas" <tomas.kukosa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 17:47:19 +0200
Hello Graeme,
 
use following:
#.FN_BODY BuiltInContentType/_untag
...
#.END

Let me know if you meet any other problem.
 
Regards,
  Tomas

________________________________

Od: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx za uživatele Graeme Lunt
Odesláno: so 20.10.2007 16:27
Komu: 'Developer support list for Wireshark'
Předmět: Re: [Wireshark-dev] BER ASN1 generated dissectors update?



Anders,

I am trying to use -X -T flags with the x411 dissector.

I need to move some of my code in the conformance file for the
dissect_x411_<TYPE> function
to the
dissect_x411_<TYPE>_U function (as that is where the data is now actually
handled).

(The actual type I have the problem with is BuiltInContentType).

If I just add _U to the function name in the FN_BODY declaration, then the
whole FN_BODY is ignored by asn2wrs.
I also tried using an FN_VARIANT = _U, with no success.

Any pointers on should I go about changing the conformance file?

Graeme

> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Anders Broman
> Sent: 18 October 2007 10:22
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] BER ASN1 generated dissectors update?
>
> 
>
> >Just to be clear, could you give an example of the type of
> "workarounds" that can be removed from each of these two >locations?
>
> For the -T option an example from SNMP:
> --- snip ---
> #.FN_BODY PDUs/get-request
>  gint8 class;
>  gboolean pc, ind_field;
>  gint32 tag;
>  guint32 len1;
>
>  if(!implicit_tag){
>    /* XXX  asn2wrs can not yet handle tagged assignment yes so this
>     * XXX is some conformance file magic to work around that bug
>     */
>     offset = get_ber_identifier(tvb, offset, &class, &pc, &tag);
>     offset = get_ber_length(tvb, offset, &len1, &ind_field);
>  }
> --- snip ---
> For the ambitious looking at DAP there is commented ASN1
> code, this code
> *should* work uncommented now...
> The EXTERNAL type should also be handled by asn2wrs now (may require
> some hand coding).
> Regards
> Anders
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev


<<winmail.dat>>