Bryant Eastham schrieb:
All-
I have been a user of Wireshark for several years. I have been writing
plugins for some internal protocols, but up until now have had limited
ability to repay the wireshark community. I now have a need that may
both help me, and allow some payback�
First, let me say that I have been impressed with the new Expert Info
and have been integrating many protocol validations into my plugins.
As we develop implementations it is extremely useful for the engineers
to use this information as validation � saving a lot of frustration
during integration. Thanks Ulf!
:-)
One potential use of both wireshark/tshark and expert info is not
supported, however.
I would like to use a combination of tshark/expert info to �monitor�
our automated testing system and look for protocol violations. We
already have a great test harness, with the ability to switch OS,
network protocol, etc. automatically. What I would like to do is
configure some monitor ports on the 2 switches that we use, run the
VLAN monitors into another dedicated monitor box, and then capture all
the traffic during our test runs. This part is normal, no need for change.
In order for this to work, however, I need to:
1. Identify which tests (programs) were running at the time (this part
is easy, I can instrument the tests to advertise themselves on the
network and that will get captured (along with address and port) with
everything else.
2. Process the capture(s) and identify protocol violations. I don�t
believe this is handled today.
I'm not sure if I got your point here.
Protocol violations is one of the things that expert infos is all about.
Basically "Expert Infos" should be things that a protocol dissector
detects to be "uncommon", "not in the specs" ... well, you get the
point. This whole thing doesn't depend on any GUI releated stuff.
I have seen some posts regarding tshark and expert infos, and I would
love to see this feature fleshed out. �Love� to the point that I am
willing to spend time to make it happen�
However, I don�t want to tread on other�s areas of ownership or
reinvent the wheel, so I am asking the group for how to proceed. I
infer from several existing tshark features that outputting the expert
infos might not be extremely difficult. If it turns out that I am
wrong, then tell me now and I will not bother. If my assumption is
correct then I imagine that the first step would be to get consensus
on how to control and present the information. I imagine that making a
more concrete proposal on this list would be appropriate?
So this seems to be the more interesting question. I'm personally mostly
use Wireshark, so I'm not an expert for tshark.
Anyone with a good idea to display the expert info stuff for tshark?
Regards, ULFL