That directly contradicts what Guy Harris asked me to do earlier, namely
"I'd open bugs for each dissector (so we don't have to fix them all at
once to close the bug).". His thread in which he wrote that is here:
http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200708/msg00432.html
Can you guys please let me know how I should continue?
Thanks,
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joerg Mayer
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 2:37 PM
To: wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1785]
New:packet-dcerpc-atsvc.c display filter field problems
> Please try not to open a bug for each and every problem of this type:
> It makes it much more time intensive to review many many small patches
> than a few bigger patches. It's also more work with bugzilla.
>
> Thanks for your work though!!!
>
> ciao
> Joerg
-----------------------------------------
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the
sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, retention,
distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you
are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the
recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all
copies of this message. Also, email is susceptible to data
corruption, interception, tampering, unauthorized amendment and
viruses. We only send and receive emails on the basis that we are
not liable for any such corruption, interception, tampering,
amendment or viruses or any consequence thereof.