[Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Don,

This is the last message I've sent about UNISTIM. Since then nothing was
heard. Still we would like to get it in, since there's interest in it.
Are you still working on it?

Thanx,
Jaap

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:47:19 +0200
From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Patch] Unistim dissector plugin [Sample
    captures attached]

Yep, that does work much better :)
I also took out some unicode characters and a left over // comment.

Fuzztesting still finds some problems in proto_item_fill_label() calls
where the fi->hinfo is invalid. Not sure what it is yet.

I'm away until monday, so you'll have some time to play around with with
fuzztest.

Thanx,
Jaap


Newton, Don wrote:
> Gotcha, here you go.
>
> Don Newton
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jaap Keuter
> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 1:36 PM
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Patch] Unistim dissector plugin [Sample
> captures attached]
>
> Hi,
>
> First try to run your samples without display filter and the colorize
> packet list switched Off. Not pretty, but both problems are simple to
> fix....
>
> Thanx,
> Jaap
>
>
> Newton, Don wrote:
>> No problem I will either do this evening or tomorrow.
>>
>> Don Newton
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jaap Keuter
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 5:01 PM
>> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
>> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Patch] Unistim dissector plugin
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The plugin looks good, now we need some sample captures for a
> testdrive
>> (fuzztest). Can you whip up a Wiki protocol page and add the sample
>> captures?
>>
>> Thanx,
>> Jaap
>>
>> Newton, Don wrote:
>>> I have corrected all deficits that were noted.  I also have changed
> so
>>> rudp sequence id shows in info column.  Please let me know if there
> is
>>> anything else I am missing.
>>>
>>> Don Newton
>>>

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev