lookups are for most cases done once at registration... so I do not
think it is much impact.
On 8/9/07, Martin Mathieson <martin.r.mathieson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 8/9/07, Luis EG Ontanon <luis.ontanon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > shouldn't we just be registering by name all dissectors for once and for
> > all?
> >
>
> I'd vote for that. I'm sick of (and a little self-conscious about)
> making individual dissectors findable by name - usually so that the
> DCT2000 dissector can find protocol handles.
>
> Presumably adding many more entries to the table would slow down the
> lookup - would this likely to noticable?
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
--
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
-- Marshall McLuhan
Propertarianism joined to capitalist vigor destroyed meaningful
commercial competition, but when it came to making good software,
anarchism won.
-- Eben Moglen