[Sebastien Tandel <sebastien@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi, 

I've spot it. I will correct it as soon as I have two minutes.

... but it is indeed better to file a bug report :)

Regards,

Sebastien Tandel

On Aug 1, 2007, at 2:22 PM, Jaap Keuter wrote:

Hi,

Better file a bugreport on that.

Thanx,

Jaap

On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 amine.dhraief@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Folks

in epan/dissector/packet-ipv6.h there is a mistacke in the assigned

number of the update request and update ack shim6 control message.

Accordingly to  draft-ietf-shim6-proto-08 page 93 the update request

has a value 64 and the update ack 65.

Regards

Amine Dhraief

_______________________________________________

Wireshark-dev mailing list

Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Regards,

Sebastien Tandel