["Maynard, Chris" <Christopher.Maynard@xxxxxxxxx>]

I've successfully built customized rpm's for Fedora Core 4 as well as
later Fedora releases, but not specifically for FC3; however, I have
also built rpm's for Red Hat 9, so in theory you should be able to build
one for FC3.

Can you verify that you first ran autogen.sh before running the
configure script? (REF: Developer's guide, section 3.5.1:
http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsdg_html/#id4719212, or the wiki:
http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development)

- Chris


-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bryant,
Stephanie
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 9:53 AM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problems building Wireshark 0.99.6

Hi,

My apologies for the misspelling of the name.

However, rpm tells me that the package is not installed and 
Locate only finds the source information that I downloaded.
RPM query does not find it either.

Stephanie

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Martin Peylo
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 9:41 AM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problems building Webshark 0.99.6

Hi,

you should have an rpm in your distribution if you're searching for
"Wireshark", not "Webshark" - provided that you're looking for a
network protocol analyzer.

Regards,
Martin


On 7/26/07, Bryant, Stephanie <sbryant@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Greetings,
>
>
>
> I am a newbie administrator and I am new to webshark.
>
>
>
> Does webshark exist as an rpm anywhere?
>
>
>
> I downloaded the latest source version of webshark from the website.
>
> I am experiencing difficulties building webshark 0.99.6 on Fedora Core
3
> Linux.
>
>
>
> Execution of the "configure" scripts ends in the following error
messages:
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.0.0... Will use uninstalled version
of GTK+
> found in PKG_CONFIG_PATH
>
> yes (version 2.10.14)
>
> checking for pkg-config... (cached) /usr/local/bin/pkg-config
>
> checking for GLIB - version >= 2.0.0... Will use uninstalled version
of GLib
> found in PKG_CONFIG_PATH
>
> yes (version 2.12.13)
>
> checking whether GLib supports loadable modules... no
>
> checking for inttypes.h... (cached) yes
>
> checking whether inttypes.h defines the PRI[doxu]64 macros... no
>
> checking whether %llx can be used to format 64-bit integers... no
>
> checking whether %Lx can be used to format 64-bit integers... no
>
> checking whether %qx can be used to format 64-bit integers... no
>
> configure: error: neither %llx nor %Lx nor %qx worked on a 64-bit
integer
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>
> Also, GTK+ and GLIB were installed in /usr/local/lib
>
>
>
> I have attached to contents of the config.log file.
>
>
>
> Thank you for any assistance or further direction that you can
provide.
>
>
>
> Stephanie
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
-----------------------------------------
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the
sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, retention,
distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you
are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the
recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all
copies of this message. Also, email is susceptible to data
corruption, interception, tampering, unauthorized amendment and
viruses. We only send and receive emails on the basis that we are
not liable for any such corruption, interception, tampering,
amendment or viruses or any consequence thereof.