I am not using tshark, i am using wireshark........
is not it safe in the scenario i explained
Joshua Wright <jwright@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
07/02/2007 05:51 PM
|
Please respond to
Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
|
To
| Developer support list for Wireshark
<wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| Re: [Wireshark-dev] filter _expression_
required |
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Amit Paliwal wrote:
> I cant afford to loose any packet because I have to run this application
> for RTOS so packets will eb coming with great speed.
If this is the case, then I wouldn't recommend tshark. Windump might
be
a better tool here, with the syntax:
windump.exe -i \Device\NPF_{52EFAA93-34C5-4F7E-80AE-638A48E3F1BD} "udp
and port 137"
You can get Windump from http://www.winpcap.org/windump/install/.
- -Josh
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)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=nAHR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________