Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Parallel Redundancy Protocol (PRP) dissector

From: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 09:51:30 +0800

Oops, overlooked this one.  Any idea *how*?

(I'm terribly busy these days so not much time to research it.)

Stephen Fisher wrote:
Let's disable it by default to avoid the overhead of checking every packet.

On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 05:53:19PM +0800, Jeff Morriss wrote:
Hi list,

What do you think--how should we go about this?

-J

Glattfelder Christoph (glc) wrote:
Hello Jeff

Unfortunately, a frame must be searched for the trailer to recognize it as PRP frame. But I see no problem to have it disabled by default.

Best regards

Christoph Glattfelder

Z??rcher Hochschule Winterthur
Institute of Embedded Systems - InES

Technikumstrasse 9
Postfach 805
CH-8401 Winterthur
Tel. +41(0)52 260 69 74

christoph.glattfelder@xxxxxxxx


-----Urspr??ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jeff Morriss [mailto:jeff.morriss@xxxxxxxxxxx] Gesendet: Montag, 16. April 2007 10:26
An: Developer support list for Wireshark; Glattfelder Christoph (glc)
Betreff: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Parallel Redundancy Protocol (PRP) dissector



Meier Sven (msv) wrote:
This is a dissector for the Parallel Redundancy Protocol (PRP) defined in chapter 6 of the IEC 62439.

PRP uses two independent networks in parallel and allows redundancy without switchovers.

The protocol is sending Mac multicast messages with Ethertype 0x88fb. In addition to that it adds to every Ethernet frame a 4 byte trailer before the FCS. The trailer is detected by checking a size field and an identifier which are part of the trailer. Therefore, if the last 4 bytes of a frame match a correct trailer they get interpreted as a trailer, although it was probably not a real one.
Is there some way to know if the trailer is going to be there without searching for it? As it is, registered as a postdissector (didn't even know those existed until now), this dissector will get called for every frame--which seems a bit excessive to me.

If there's no way to know ahead of time, maybe this dissector should be disabled by default, though I'm not sure how to best go about doing that.


_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev