[Sebastien Tandel <sebastien@xxxxxxxxx>]

Sending twice the same mail may help to get an answer, yes. But it is true that you guys might have done some research on your own because the second mail doesn't show any motivation or advances on your side.

On the other hand, I don't think social etiquette recommends to throw away people asking something on the right mailing-list.

Wireshark docs are present with the sources in the doc repository. You might want to read them first to get a more precise idea of how is working the internals of wireshark.

I don't think however there is something which saves packets in a database.

Regards,

Sebastien Tandel

On 22 May 2007, at 12:23, Richard van der Hoff wrote:

cedrik helou wrote:

We are a group of 3 Lebanese computer engineering students; we are 

working on a project concerning the development of wireshark. We are 

facing difficulties finding the wireshark internal database (where it 

stores the paquets captured) and connecting it to an external database 

(oracle or mysql) witch will be easier to manipulate.

we thank you in advance for any help you can provide us

Do you really think that sending this, twice, to the entire contributors 

list, is going to help you get an answer?

You might try doing some of your own research, too.

Go away, and don't come back until you've learnt a little social etiquette.

_______________________________________________

Wireshark-dev mailing list

Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev