Hmmm... OK, I have yet had to use the M3UA dissector, didn't know
that. Anyway, in SUA/SCCP too, it is possible for the CgPA and CdPA to
be only PC-SSN. So, if SCCP/SUA does set the transport address as GT,
it should also set it to point code if only point code is available.
Perhaps the others have something to say about this too. I am curious
though, how do you think it will help?
On 3/28/07, Luis Ontanon <luis.ontanon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There still be the IP addresses in net_src/net_dst. It would be much
like M3UA does that replaces ip src and ip dst by the opc and dpc
(which I do not doubt it is ok).
What I wonder about is whether the GT is an address or should it be
just taken as a "port" on a certain address.
On 3/28/07, Abhik Sarkar <sarkar.abhik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In case of SUA, wouldn't this mean pinfo->src and pinfo->dst would no
> longer have the IP end-points of the SCTP association? Is yes, is that
> desirable?
>
> On 3/28/07, Luis Ontanon <luis.ontanon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Would it be correct to add an AT_SS7_GT to the address types and have
> > sccp/sua setting the GTs as pinfo->src & pinfo->dst ???
> >
> > Isn't the global title an actual (transport) address?
> >
> > Luis
> >
> > --
> > This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
> > -- Marshall McLuhan
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireshark-dev mailing list
> > Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
--
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
-- Marshall McLuhan
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev