On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 08:21:24AM +0000, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
> I dont think it is really realistic to have all autogenerated files
> always compile without any warnings.
Which warnings do you have in mind specifically? Why do you think they
can't be avoided?
> Maybe we should instead split Makefile.common up into three parts :
>
> First part : normal dissectors
>
> Second part : ANS2WRS generated dissectors which take extra compile
> time flags and definitions to suppress artefacts from the compiler.
I think they should just be generated from their "real sources" on each
build, thus removing the need to manually rebuild them at all.
> Third part : PIDL generated dissectors that once again take extra
> compile parameters and definitions.
dito.
ciao
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.