Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] FYI: Status of gcc warnings in epan/dissectors

From: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:04:27 +0800


Stephen Fisher wrote:

Almost all of the warnings I've fixed so far are "sign mismatches"between guint8* and (g)char* :(. 552 of the 795 remaining warningsoutside of the .cnf files are this problem.


Is casting away signed and unsigned really the way to go with that?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] FYI: Status of gcc warnings in epan/dissectors
  - From: Stephen Fisher

References:
- [Wireshark-dev] FYI: Status of gcc warnings in epan/dissectors
  - From: Stephen Fisher

Prev by Date: [Wireshark-dev] Some (unfixed) warnings
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] FYI: Status of gcc warnings in epan/dissectors
Previous by thread: [Wireshark-dev] FYI: Status of gcc warnings in epan/dissectors
Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] FYI: Status of gcc warnings in epan/dissectors
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread