[Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jeff Morriss wrote:

> What about renaming the current field "frame.time_delta_displayed" and 
> name the new one "frame.time_delta"?  That changes the current field but 
> it sounds a whole lot more intuitive to me.

Or "delta_displayed" and "delta_captured", which means that any 
"frame.time_delta" filter would fail rather than filtering something 
different from what it did before the change.