[Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Guy Harris wrote:

> Unfortunately, that doesn't handle the "Generator 1"/"Generator 2"/...  
> issue.
>
> It might be useful to add new APIs that take an array index as an  
> argument, and that add the array index value after the field name in  
> the display representation of the item.  (I think we may have  
> discussed the issue of arrays earlier; I'll look for that discussion  
> later.)

Found it:

	http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200611/msg02796.html

	http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200611/msg02803.html

	http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200611/msg02808.html