-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Stephen Fisher wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 02:23:54PM -0800, Stephen Fisher wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 08:03:56AM -0800, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
>>
>>> I initially tried to implement the new STUN (STUNv2) in the same
>>> dissector, but at the end it was very messy. A little bit of
>>> history can help to understand the situation:
>> Thanks for the explaination. I have committed your changes as SVN
>> revision 20131 with one change: all references to STUNv2 and stun in
>> packet-stun2.c have been changed to STUN2 or stun2 for consistency.
>
> Marc, could you please add a page to the wiki for STUN to explain what
> the protocol does and explain the differences in the first and second
> versions? You can create a new page by going to
> http://wiki.wireshark.org/STUN and choose Protocol Template on the left
> to help you get started.
>
Sure, I'll do this.
- --
Marc Petit-Huguenin [ ]
Home: marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [ RFC1855-compliant space for rent]
Work: marc@xxxxxxx [ ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFgIJi9RoMZyVa61cRAusAAJwLR9r5U8vYr3ORZj9ZHxnLeWV15ACcC4w7
4zMXoe1hkkv/TT01uW3hlc0=
=NNdY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----