Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 19901: /trunk/ /trunk/dtds/: mscml.d

Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
From: Ulf Lamping <ulf.lamping@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 22:26:08 +0100
martinm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=19901

User: martinm
Date: 2006/11/15 05:27 PM

Log:
 From Olivier Jacques:
Here is a DTD for the MSCML protocol, draft-07. This implementation is not entirely up-to-date (draft-09 is out), but this is a good base to start from. I updated the WIKI with info, snapshot and sample capture: http://wiki.wireshark.org/MSCML 

Directory: /trunk/dtds/
  Changes    Path          Action
  +280 -0    mscml.dtd     Added

Directory: /trunk/packaging/nsis/
  Changes    Path             Action
  +1 -0      wireshark.nsi    Modified

Directory: /trunk/
  Changes    Path           Action
  +1 -0      Makefile.am    Modified
Is there a reason to not use a wildcard in the wireshark.nsi file? Or the other way around, are there *.dtd files that should not be included in the setup?
By simply using *.dtd we wouldn't need to change this file "all the time" a new dtd is added (and therefore won't be forgotten). 

Regards, ULFL