Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Replace ntohl() with g_ntohl() -> automated check?

From: Ulf Lamping <ulf.lamping@xxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 00:57:16 +0100

LEGO wrote:

what about #defining them so they trigger an error?

Although this would be a nice solution, I don't see a way to do this -it will conflict with the existing function declarations IMHO.


I would be more than glad if we could do it that simple ...

Regards, ULFL

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Replace ntohl() with g_ntohl() -> automated check?
  - From: Richard van der Hoff
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Replace ntohl() with g_ntohl() -> automated check?
  - From: Thomas Steffen

References:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Replace ntohl() with g_ntohl()
  - From: Jaap Keuter
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Replace ntohl() with g_ntohl() -> automated check?
  - From: Ulf Lamping
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Replace ntohl() with g_ntohl() -> automated check?
  - From: LEGO

Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Enabling threads
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Warnings in gtkvumeter.c
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Replace ntohl() with g_ntohl() -> automated check?
Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Replace ntohl() with g_ntohl() -> automated check?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread