yes
On 10/15/06, Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
When looking at the dissector, I wondered whether the following patch
would be ok/appropriate:
Index: epan/dissectors/packet-usb.c
===================================================================
--- epan/dissectors/packet-usb.c (revision 19541)
+++ epan/dissectors/packet-usb.c (working copy)
@@ -556,7 +556,7 @@
proto_register_field_array(proto_usb, hf, array_length(hf));
proto_register_subtree_array(usb_subtrees, array_length(usb_subtrees));
- register_dissector("eth", dissect_usb, proto_usb);
+ register_dissector("usb", dissect_usb, proto_usb);
}
void
ciao
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev