Martin,
Thanks for your quick response. As I am not a developer I will wait for the
next release.
Keith French.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Mathieson" <martin.mathieson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Developer support list for Wireshark" <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 12:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Small [Patch] to H.323 VoIP calls
Thanks for the capture, Keith. The problem was with h450 hf fields that
weren't initialised sucessfully (at all in one case, or with non-unique
filter strings in several others) - it was hitting an assertion in proto.c
when an attempt was made to use those fields.
I was able to test by editing packet-h450.c directly, I couldn't
regenerate
it from packet-h450-template.c. I'm attaching a patch to
packet-h450-template.c that hopefully does the same thing. If someone can
generate and check it packet-h450.c in for me I'll retest.
Thanks,
Martin
If you could send a capture showing the problem to the list (or directly
to
me if you'd prefer), I'll take a look.
Martin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Keith French" <keithfrench@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Developer support list for Wireshark" <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 25 July 2006 21:48
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Small [Patch] to H.323 VoIP calls
> Guys,
>
> Thanks for your efforts, as I am not a developer, I await 0.99.3 with
> interest.
>
>
> Keith French.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Martin Mathieson" <martin.mathieson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Developer support list for Wireshark"
> <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 10:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Small [Patch] to H.323 VoIP calls
>
>
> > Thanks, it looks like this should also fix part of the problem
reported
> > in bug 1012 ("H225 Dissector Bug & VoIP Calls graph not OK"). My
trace
> > had no decoding errors.
> >
> > Martin
> >
> >
> > Jaap Keuter wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>Checked in.
> >>
> >>Thanx,
> >>Jaap
> >>
> >>On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Martin Mathieson wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>I'm not sure if this will help with the problems that Keith French
> >>>is
> >>>seeing, but when I loaded some of my old H.323 traces, one of them
would
> >>>assert/abort. This patch fixes that assertion (looks like it was
> >>>obviously
> >>>asserting on the wrong pointer variable).
> >>>
> >>>Regards,
> >>>Martin
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Wireshark-dev mailing list
> >>Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireshark-dev mailing list
> > Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.4/399 - Release Date:
25/07/2006
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.4/399 - Release Date:
25/07/2006
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.4/402 - Release Date: 27/07/2006
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.4/402 - Release Date: 27/07/2006