["Steve Grinwis" <sgrinwis@xxxxxxx>]

Ok.  Please find attached my patch for readme.win32.  It should
hopefully be a good starting point for people trying to build Wireshark
on windows for the first time.






-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Cook, Timothy
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 3:51 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Ethereal to Wireshark issues

My mistake, the distclean should be used after the verify_tools. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Cook, Timothy
> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 3:47 PM
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Ethereal to Wireshark issues
> 
> You may want to include: nmake -fmakefile.nmake distclean as 
> the first step.  This will get rid of auto generated files 
> that may cause initial Win32 build to fail.
> 
> -Tim
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve 
> > Grinwis
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 2:47 PM
> > To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Ethereal to Wireshark issues
> > 
> > I'm going to work up a path to the readme.win32 to include this 
> > information.  I think it would be a good idea to include standard 
> > build instructions something like this:
> > 
> > To get a standard build working:
> > 
> > To start setup and download all the required packages:
> > Nmake -f Makefile.nmake setup
> > 
> > To verify that you have all of the tools required to build 
> Wireshark:
> > Nmake -f Makefile.nmake verify_tools
> > 
> > To build Wireshark:
> > Nmake -f Makefile.nmake
> > 
> > To get Wireshark Ready to run:
> > Nmake -f Makefile.nmake install-deps
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Did I forget anything?  If that's all the required steps to get a 
> > running ethereal, then I'll make up a patch for
> > readme.win32 and we'll
> > go from there.   Having this kind of info would have been a 
> great help
> > when I started working with Ethereal/Wireshark
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter 
> > Johansson
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 9:58 AM
> > To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Ethereal to Wireshark issues
> > 
> > One have to remember though to run nmake with the 
> install-deps build 
> > target after every recompilation of the source (for any change you 
> > make). Otherwise Wireshark is started with the old compiled code. I 
> > can't remember the amount of times I have been trying to 
> debug my code 
> > and it just does not seem to be executing what I just rewrote.
> > 
> > Why is the install-deps build target not a default operation when 
> > building on Windows? Is there a reason for it?
> > 
> > / Regards, Peter
> > 
> > Steve Grinwis wrote:
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > 	Using the install-deps build target fixed the problem.  
> > It works like
> > > a charm (well... it loads the plugin).  Now the only problems
> > that
> > > I have are ones with my code.   And I can deal with my 
> > code.   Thanks
> > so
> > > much!
> > >
> > > -Steve
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> > Jaap Keuter
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 5:11 AM
> > > To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> > > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Ethereal to Wireshark issues
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Isn't that why we have the install-deps build target?
> > >
> > > Thanx,
> > > Jaap
> > >
> > > On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Graham Bloice wrote:
> > >
> > >   
> > >>> I rebuilt Wireshark to see if I could find any errors in
> > the build.
> > >>>       
> > > I
> > >   
> > >>> came across a few things.
> > >>>
> > >>>       
> > >> <SNIP>
> > >>
> > >>     
> > >>>         rm -rf 0.99.2
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> It actually removes the 0.99.2 directory after it builds the
> > >>>       
> > > plug-ins.
> > >   
> > >>> And the whole "Cannot find module" error looks very 
> similar to the
> > >>>       
> > > error
> > >   
> > >>> I get at run time.   Any thoughts?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>       
> > >> On windows, you can't run Wireshark from the build 
> directory.  The
> > >>     
> > > makefiles
> > >   
> > >> temporarily create an environment that can run the exe 
> to generate
> > >>     
> > > some docs
> > >   
> > >> etc., then destroy it.
> > >>
> > >> I have a batch file that I run after building that copies all the
> > >>     
> > > dll's and
> > >   
> > >> exe's to the appropriate places that a previous standard
> > install has
> > >>     
> > > created
> > >   
> > >> and I then run the app from there.
> > >>
> > >> You can also install nsis and make an installer, but that
> > takes a lot
> > >>     
> > > longer
> > >   
> > >> than just copying the executables.
> > >>
> > >> Graham
> > >>
> > >>     



---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.

Attachment: mypatch.gz
Description: mypatch.gz