http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=35973
User: guy
Date: 2011/02/16 08:35 PM
Log:
Use "XXX != NULL" rather than "XXX" to test for a null pointer; either
I'm missing something or the MSVC++ code analyzer doesn't realize that
in
if (XXX)
dereference XXX
will not dereference XXX if it's null - maybe "if (XXX != NULL)" will do
the trick (if so, the code analyzer is buggy, because "if (XXX !=
NULL)", "if (XXX != 0)", and "if (XXX)" mean the exact same thing if XXX
is a pointer-valued expression, really, truly, even if a null pointer
isn't represented as all zero bits or if it's wider than an int).
Clean up indentation.
Directory: /trunk/
Changes Path Action
+31 -32 capture_ui_utils.c Modified