http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=32771
User: etxrab
Date: 2010/05/12 03:31 AM
Log:
From Tamas Regos:
WSLUA improvement.
The existing ProtoField.bool looks like the following:
ProtoField.bool(abbr, [name], [desc])
But checking any protocol dissector with bool protofield, it can be seen that
in C code we have more options than thru the WSLUA interface.
E.g.: {&hf_gtp_qos_sig_ind,{"Signalling Indication", "gtp.sig_ind", FT_BOOLEAN,
8, TFS(>p_sig_ind), GTP_EXT_QOS_SIG_IND_MASK, NULL, HFILL}},
So I've extended ProtoField.bool to have more options like this:
ProtoField.bool(abbr, [name], [bitfield], [true_false_string], [mask], [desc])
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4700
Directory: /trunk/epan/wslua/
Changes Path Action
+3 -3 wslua.h Modified
+122 -14 wslua_proto.c Modified
+1 -1 wslua_tree.c Modified