Michael Mann
changed
bug 13221
Comment # 4
on bug 13221
from Michael Mann
Created attachment 15117 [details]
Patch for ROLE_REQUEST
Here's a quick patch for the capture provided. It fixes the issue for the
ROLE_REQUEST packet provided, but seems to open a can or worms as to how far
that can go.
Since I don't know the protocol, others can comment on how far this patch has
to be taken. Do the switch statement need to be broken up for each time with
the request reparsed? (Should the complete reparse be a preference? - I would
vote no, but I'm not sure of the popularity of including the complete request
in the error response)
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.