Comment # 13
on bug 12958
from Fayçal NOUSHI
Created attachment 15076 [details]
sigtran_piggybacking_with_no_map_in_middle
Attached a SIGTRAN trace containing a packet with 3 TCAP parts and 2 MAP. Since
the TCAP part is in the middle, it's not safe to put tcap and gsm_map values in
two different arrays
If we do that, we won't be able to tell if the last MAP message corresponds to
the second TCAP or the third. This information is originally in the ordering of
the layers.
Also, note, that a few other TCAP messages can be without MAP (Continue,
End...). It's not necessarily a TCAP Abort.
Nesting gsm_map under tcap would be the best way to go here but I'm not sure of
the complexity behind it...
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.