Comment # 14
on bug 12067
from Matt Day
(In reply to Gerald Combs from comment #12)
> (In reply to Gerald Combs from comment #11)
> > (In reply to Matt Day from comment #8)
> > > It seems nobody has tested Wireshark+Qt5 much beyond successful compilation.
> >
> > Are you referring to the official packages from wireshark.org or the
> > homebrew-compiled executables?
>
> Note that I'm not trying to be snarky here. The official Wireshark packages
> for macOS are compiled with versions of Qt, GLib, and other libraries that
> don't change very often and are known to work reasonably well. The Wireshark
> application is installed as an application bundle and *not* as a bare
> executable. The further homebrew diverges from the wireshark.org installer
> the more opportunities for misadventure will arise.
That's an excellent point, and not snarky at all. Thanks!
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.