Comment # 7
on bug 12568
from [email protected]
yes, i can open the link now.
I don't think that this will fix the problem.
Please consult RFC5575 section 4.
what seems to be wrong in the original code is the following line:
tot_flow_len = len_16 >> 4;
The length is encoded as 2 byte in case of > 239 with most significant nibble
all ones.
So what you will have in len_16 is 0xfnnn. You must therefore skip the ones in
the most significant nibble to all zero. I guess a bitmask would work here
perfectly.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.