Comment # 7
on bug 11405
from Richard Sharpe
(In reply to gordon.w.ross from comment #6)
> (In reply to Richard Sharpe from comment #5)
> > I have not looked at this in a while, but I think I have captures.
> >
> > It should simply be a change in the string used.
>
> Yes, you're correct. Just the name is wrong.
> Should I change the function name too? (I guess).
Yes, I would prefer that. I hate it when the function name does not match the
intent.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.