Comment # 7
on bug 11860
from Guy Harris
(In reply to João Valverde from comment #6)
> The most natural formal interpretation would be an AND relation, which the
> operator doesn't follow anyway, for convenience.
I.e., the _expression_ {field} {op} {value} should be interpreted as "for all
instances of {field}, the relation '{value of that instance of the field} {op}
{value}' is true", rather than as "there is an instance of {field} such that
the relation '{value of that instance of the field} {op} {value}' is true"?
That would mean that "ip.addr == 192.168.0.1" would only match packets from
192.168.0.1 to 192.168.0.1; I'm not sure that would be useful.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.