| Bug ID |
11698
|
| Summary |
Rescanning file with dispaly filter is much slower than opening file with the same dispaly filter
|
| Product |
Wireshark
|
| Version |
1.99.x (Experimental)
|
| Hardware |
x86
|
| OS |
Windows 7
|
| Status |
UNCONFIRMED
|
| Severity |
Major
|
| Priority |
Low
|
| Component |
Qt UI
|
| Assignee |
[email protected]
|
| Reporter |
[email protected]
|
Created attachment 13997 [details]
opening file with display filter lte_rrc
Build Information:
Version 2.1.0 (Git Rev Unknown from unknown)
Copyright 1998-2015 Gerald Combs <[email protected]> and contributors.
License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later
<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.html>
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Compiled (32-bit) with Qt 5.5.0, with WinPcap (4_1_3), with libz 1.2.8, with
GLib 2.38.0, with SMI 0.4.8, with c-ares 1.9.1, with Lua 5.2, with GnuTLS
3.2.15, with Gcrypt 1.6.2, with MIT Kerberos, with GeoIP, with QtMultimedia,
with AirPcap.
Running on 64-bit Windows 7 Service Pack 1, build 7601, with locale C, with
WinPcap version 4.1.3 (packet.dll version 4.1.0.2980), based on libpcap version
1.0 branch 1_0_rel0b (20091008), with GnuTLS 3.2.15, with Gcrypt 1.6.2, with
AirPcap 4.1.0 build 1622.
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4310M CPU @ 2.70GHz (with SSE4.2), with 8105MB of physical
memory.
--
Rescanning file with dispaly filter is much slower than opening file with the
same dispaly filter.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.