[bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Comment # 6 on bug 11009 from Alexis La Goutte

(In reply to Peter Wu from comment #5)
> (In reply to Alexis La Goutte from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Peter Wu from comment #3)
> > > -fsanitize=undefined seem to have a negative effect on compile times:
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg01203.html
> > > 
> > > And apparently also an impact on runtime performance
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44786#c1
> > > 
> > > For automated you probably want the -fno-sanitize-recover (enabled in GCC
> > > 5.0 and newer, Clang ??):
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60275
> > > 
> > > Suggestion: rename --enable-asan to --enable-fsanitize, testing for address
> > > and undefined sanitizers. Description: Enable ASAN and UBSan (longer compile
> > > times, runtime overhead).
> > Ok for me :-)
> > You push a patch ?
> 
> Currently busy with testing for differences between cmake and autoconf
> builds, can you prepare the patch? I'll review.

Busy too !

---

      You are receiving this mail because:

• You are watching all bug changes.