Comment # 2
on bug 10939
from Chris Maynard
(In reply to Alexis La Goutte from comment #1)
> There is a update of Parameter Problem (Adding Length field) on RFC 4884
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4884#section-4.3
This is a strange way for Wireshark to display this field though, no? It would
seem to make more sense for Wireshark to display it more simply, something
like:
Length of the padded "original datagram": 356
rather than:
Length of original datagram: 89 Length of original datagram: 356
Another modification that could be made would be for Wireshark to highlight the
2 still unused bytes and even add an expert info if they are found to be
non-zero, since, according to RFC 792:
Any field
labeled "unused" is reserved for later extensions and must be zero
when sent
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.