Comment # 5
on bug 10364
from Hadriel Kaplan
The comment in the code is actually right - it goes against RFC 3261 to send a
Contact with expires=0 back in the response, since a response to a REGISTER is
only supposed to contain *current* bindings, not removed ones. Nor did RFC 5626
(which added the "reg-id" param) change that behavior.
But 3GPP has bent the rules before for their profile of SIP, so we might as
well ignore the Contact being there. (i.e., not issue an expert warning) Or
change it to PI_NOTE instead of PI_WARN.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.