Comment # 7
on bug 10705
from [email protected]
(In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #6)
> From a quick code review, it seems that the payload associated to the last
> header is put at the same level as IPv6, presumably to easily show the
> protocol encapsulated in IPv6 packet.
> IMHO putting it inside IPv6 tree would degrade a bit readability.
Isn't it confusing that different types of extension headers behave
differently?
Also, why does it make sense that an IPv6 Authentication extension header would
be inside IPv6 if it comes before Mobility extension header and below it if it
comes after Mobility extension header?
I think that it only makes sense if all extension headers are inside IPv6 or
all of them below it.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.