Comment # 3
on bug 10636
from J. Bruce Fields
(In reply to Evan Huus from comment #2)
> Hi there, thanks for the report. I have uploaded a possible alternate fix to
> our code review site,
Thanks, that looks reasonable, except: I see two spots where
rpc_call->proc_info is assigned a pointer returned from an rpc_procs lookup,
one here in dissect_rpc_indir_call(), the other in dissect_rpc_message(), and I
think you're patching only the former though it's likely the latter I'm
hitting.
> please let me know if it fixes the problem.
>
> Also, if you could attach a small sample capture demonstrating the problem
> so that I could test it myself, that would be much appreciated.
Yes, I'll test and look for a pcap.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.