Comment # 2
on bug 10651
from Evan Huus
A more useful backtrace of the original (uncaught) exception being triggered:
#3 0x00007ffff48fbdbf in do_throw (except=except@entry=0x7fffffffd760) at
except.c:212
#4 0x00007ffff48fbec3 in except_throw (group=group@entry=1, code=<optimized
out>, msg=msg@entry=0x0) at except.c:289
#5 0x00007ffff4937a21 in ensure_contiguous (length=<optimized out>,
offset=<optimized out>, tvb=<optimized out>) at tvbuff.c:703
#6 tvb_get_ptr (tvb=<optimized out>, offset=<optimized out>, length=<optimized
out>) at tvbuff.c:837
#7 0x00007ffff491000b in write_pdml_field_hex_value (fi=0x6,
fi@entry=0x7fffecca6c70, pdata=<optimized out>, pdata=<optimized out>) at
print.c:893
#8 0x00007ffff4910503 in proto_tree_write_node_pdml (node=0x7fffecca6ce0,
data="" at print.c:349
#9 0x00007ffff4913719 in proto_tree_children_foreach (tree=0x4fc3,
tree@entry=0x7fffecca6920, func=0x4fc3, func@entry=0x7ffff4910080
<proto_tree_write_node_pdml>,
data="" data@entry=0x7fffffffdab0) at proto.c:637
#10 0x00007ffff4910266 in proto_tree_write_node_pdml (node=0x7fffecca6920,
data="" at print.c:491
#11 0x00007ffff4913719 in proto_tree_children_foreach (tree=0x4fc3,
func=0x4fc3, data="" at proto.c:637
#12 0x00007ffff4911040 in proto_tree_write_pdml (edt=0x11961f0,
fh=0x7ffff255d400 <_IO_2_1_stdout_>) at print.c:282
#13 0x00000000004135e7 in print_packet (cf=cf@entry=0x63e400 <cfile>,
edt=edt@entry=0x11961f0) at tshark.c:3957
#14 0x0000000000413e13 in process_packet (cf=0x63e400 <cfile>, edt=0x11961f0,
offset=<optimized out>, whdr=0x1150c30,
pd=0x1155ac0 "\037$9W
ئ)\370\235\377c\211\006e\be\307\341B\034[(\223\n\020X\215Š", tap_flags=0) at
tshark.c:3560
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.