Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 10545] "BROWSER" protocol registration done in smb-browse

Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 13:11:25 +0000

changed bug 10545


What Removed Added
CC   [email protected]

Comment # 1 on bug 10545 from 
Which other dissector is causing the "name conflict"?  I don't see any other
dissectors with "BROWSER" or "browser" as a name.


Small side note:
There is a browser.idl in the samba source that seems like it could be
comparible to the packet-dcerpc-browser.c (which I originally assumed was where
the name conflict you mentioned was).  Should the browser.idl go through the
PIDL wireshark generator and replace the (manually created)
packet-dcerpc-browser.c?  The comparative side of the dissector and the idl
made me thing the idl has either less info or is not the same.

You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are watching all bug changes.