Comment # 12
on bug 10469
from Bill Meier
>
> I went through the RFC and a couple of implementations, no else seems to be
> imposing this restriction. Might be legacy code since the commit is from
> 2006.
Looking at the commit message (for the patch which added the test), I now
realize that the test was added to improve the "heuristic test" to verify that
the packet is actually an iSCSI packet.
Question: would it be correct to say that the "expected data length" field for
a SCSI_COMMAND must always be non-zero ?
If so, I'll change the code to test for a non-zero field.
> I'll post a fix for this
No need to post a patch. It's simple enough for me to make a change.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.