Comment # 3
on bug 10159
from Guy Harris
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > VALS() should be usable - define two separate hf_ values, with the *same*
> > field name, and with *different* value_string tables, and use the
> > appropriate one based on the subtype.
>
> This was one of the solutions proposed. This creates problems with "Unknown"
> type, no particular hf is correct there, had to resort to simply add_text,
> which is no longer navigable.
Presumably by ""Unknown" type" you mean "a subtype for which there's no correct
value_string table"; if so, then create an hf_ with an *empty* value_string
table, so that *everything* shows up as "Unknown".
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.