Comment # 33
on bug 9652
from Guy Harris
(In reply to comment #29)
> In the short term, the correct fix is perhaps to do that, and to add
> packet-size checks in the packet-write routines to prevent writing out
> packets that won't pass packet-read routine checks (I'd add a new error for
> the "packet too big" case
The packet-size checks have been added inr54882 (no need for a backport, the
changes to allow big JPEGs etc. as a single "packet" aren't in 1.10 or
earlier), with a new WTAP_ERR_PACKET_TOO_LARGE error.
> and perhaps return that for too-large packets when reading, as well).
No, that's a different issue - we treat that as "probably corrupt file".
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.