Comment # 9
on bug 9263
from Chris Maynard
(In reply to comment #8)
> Perhaps they should return guints and not gints then? Not sure how much
> signed/unsigned pain that causes though.
In the long run, yes. For now, I didn't want to deal with that very pain.
> Either way, nack on the backport, it's an API change.
You're referring only to not backporting IF we change the API from returning a
gint to returning a guint, correct? I think both patches I posted are suitable
for backporting, are they not? At the very least, certainly the first patch to
packet-tcp.c is suitable for backporting.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.