Comment # 7
on bug 9248
from Michael Mann
(In reply to comment #6)
> Comment on attachment 11741 [details]
Bugfix loop
This patch looks good to
> me. Agree that there's probably an underlying field mismatch though.
Good enough to backport and mark the issue closed? I know the unincremented
offset stuff needs to be fixed, but the other part was just a "cleaner" version
of your hack (in fact, I've cleaned it up some more (locally), but it doesn't
change the functionality of "aborting" when there's no data left in the tvb)
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.