Evan Huus
changed
bug 9243
Comment # 1
on bug 9243
from Evan Huus
I'm also seeing the following memory leaks with this capture:
==20971== 156,265 (168 direct, 156,097 indirect) bytes in 3 blocks are
definitely lost in loss record 21,110 of 21,115
==20971== at 0x4C2A2DB: malloc (in
/usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==20971== by 0x94F1DC0: g_malloc (gmem.c:104)
==20971== by 0x950795D: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:1016)
==20971== by 0x9507E9D: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:1042)
==20971== by 0x64A9EF9: fragment_add_seq_common (reassemble.c:360)
==20971== by 0x64AA157: fragment_add_seq_check_work (reassemble.c:1983)
==20971== by 0x64AB157: fragment_add_seq_check (reassemble.c:2027)
==20971== by 0x677F57C: dissect_cbch (packet-gsm_cbch.c:382)
==20971== by 0x648D1D3: call_dissector_through_handle (packet.c:492)
==20971== by 0x648D88F: call_dissector_work (packet.c:586)
==20971== by 0x648F411: call_dissector_with_data (packet.c:2105)
==20971== by 0x648D1D3: call_dissector_through_handle (packet.c:492)
==20971==
==20971== 168,352 (168 direct, 168,184 indirect) bytes in 3 blocks are
definitely lost in loss record 21,111 of 21,115
==20971== at 0x4C2A2DB: malloc (in
/usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==20971== by 0x94F1DC0: g_malloc (gmem.c:104)
==20971== by 0x950795D: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:1016)
==20971== by 0x9507E9D: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:1042)
==20971== by 0x64A9EF9: fragment_add_seq_common (reassemble.c:360)
==20971== by 0x64AA157: fragment_add_seq_check_work (reassemble.c:1983)
==20971== by 0x64AB157: fragment_add_seq_check (reassemble.c:2027)
==20971== by 0x677F0F6: dissect_cbch (packet-gsm_cbch.c:394)
==20971== by 0x648D1D3: call_dissector_through_handle (packet.c:492)
==20971== by 0x648D88F: call_dissector_work (packet.c:586)
==20971== by 0x648F411: call_dissector_with_data (packet.c:2105)
==20971== by 0x648D1D3: call_dissector_through_handle (packet.c:492)
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.