Comment # 9
on bug 9055
from Jakub Zawadzki
I'll complain.
Why SWAR? It took me a while to find it comes from 'SIMD within a register'.
Not so clear. If no one (and MSVC) complains, I'll move it as inline function
to ws_count_bits.h
Also from patch:
> While its performance is very
> good (two times faster than gcc's __builtin_popcount [1] and
> 16 instructions when compiled with gcc -O3)
This comment is invalid, I'll remove it, there is already lot of processors
with SSE 4.2 set and popcnt instruction.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.