Comment # 7
on bug 9048
from Jakub Zawadzki
(In reply to comment #4)
> Wait, no, this patch breaks combining -w and -Y: if you are writing the
> output to another capture (with -w) and have a display filter (with -Y) then
> the behaviour with/without -2 is different:
> - without -2 all frames would be written
> - with -2 only frames passing -Y would be written
>
> I think -Y should affect -w (so that you can save only requests that have a
> response, for example). So maybe process_packet needs to return three-state
> enum (FAILED_READ_FILTER, FAILED_DISPLAY_FILTER, PASSED_BOTH)?
I'd rather save all frames, like wireshark 'File -> Save as' does.
new option: --write-displayed ?
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.