Comment # 5
on bug 9024
from FF
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Hi,
> >
> > Do we need some preference which sets compilance level (by default set to
> > RFC 5420)?
>
> The rest of the quote from the RFC makes me think this was a bug fix (to the
> spec) rather than a significant version change (thus a preference would not
> be necessary):
>
> ~~~
> Prior to the change, the Length field indicated the length of the
> Value field only. After the change, as described in Section 3, the
> Length field indicates the length of the whole TLV. This change
> means that this document is consistent with the subobject format
> defined in [RFC3209] and the TLV format defined in [RFC3471].
> ~~~
Hi,
spec bug fix indeed.
Some people implemented Attributes TLV "the right way" (i.e. L == length
of the whole TLV) even before 4420bis (aka 5420). I doubt there is a
RSVP implementation that do it "wrong" (i.e. L == the length of the V part).
Thank you
Ciao
FF
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.