Comment # 8
on bug 8832
from Javier Godoy
> You add one hf_scsi_osd2_ variable but several others that are just prefixed hf_scsi_osd_ - should the others also be osd2?
I agree, that approach provides a more consistent rule for naming fields:
- If the field was defined in OSD-1 and it is reused in OSD-2 with the same
format, the same field is used (and it is prefixed with hf_scsi_osd_)
- If the field was not defined in OSD-1, it is prefixed with hf_scsi_osd2_
I will fix that and the other issues and resubmit.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.