| Bug ID |
8859
|
| Summary |
Apply consistent naming convention to checksum display filter fields and expert info.
|
| Classification |
Unclassified
|
| Product |
Wireshark
|
| Version |
unspecified
|
| Hardware |
All
|
| OS |
All
|
| Status |
CONFIRMED
|
| Severity |
Enhancement
|
| Priority |
Low
|
| Component |
Dissection engine (libwireshark)
|
| Assignee |
[email protected]
|
| Reporter |
[email protected]
|
Build Information:
--
There are many ways that dissectors make checksum validation filterable, apply
a consistent method for all. Current design thought is:
All checksum validations will be an enumeration of
"-1" (or "2"?) - unknown/disabled
"0" - good
"1" - bad
with a filter field name of <dissector>.checksum_valid
All "bad" checksums will also include an expert info filter of
<dissector>.checksum_bad
Also note that default color filters may need to be updated to support new
naming convention.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.