[bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Comment # 2 on bug 8787 from Dominique Martinet

(In reply to comment #1)
> First guess (without having tried it) is that you've got the sense of this
> condition reversed:
> 
> ~~~
> +       if (pinfo->fd->flags.visited != 0)
> +               dissect_9P_firstpass(tvb, pinfo);
> ~~~
> 
> Changing that to "==" would mean that the firstpass function would be called
> (only) on the first pass.

... Thank you. Can't believe how blind I was.

Well, if it looks good to you, it finally looks functional to me after this
change :)

---

      You are receiving this mail because:

• You are watching all bug changes.