Comment # 5
on bug 8631
from Christian Koenning
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > PROBLEM
> > =======
> > as per RFC 6887 the response header
> > has 96bit reserved bit, not 64.
> > Without the attached patch, the PCP
> > Responses are parsed incorrectly
>
> Has the RFC officially replaced the drafts (so documentation comments in the
> dissector should be updated)?
Yes, see also
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg11455.html
This patch is enabling functionality, we should add the reference to 6887 in
later versions, specifically as the Response Bit/Opcode part as per comment
above also needs rework. Would that make sense ? Or do you want to do it in a
all in one patch ?
Christian
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.